<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: dear chemistry guys: thanks. love, jimmy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ldopa.net/2006/10/11/dear-chemistry-guys-thanks-love-jimmy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ldopa.net/2006/10/11/dear-chemistry-guys-thanks-love-jimmy/</link>
	<description>in perpetual beta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 23:23:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcel Reinert</title>
		<link>http://ldopa.net/2006/10/11/dear-chemistry-guys-thanks-love-jimmy/comment-page-1/#comment-88864</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcel Reinert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 02:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ldopa.net/2006/10/11/dear-chemistry-guys-thanks-love-jimmy/#comment-88864</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Echt ein interessanter Blog, werde sicherlich noch öfter mal hier reinschauen! Deine Artikel sind auch echt spitze! Lieben Gruß</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fanta zero ingredients - Dogpile Web Search</title>
		<link>http://ldopa.net/2006/10/11/dear-chemistry-guys-thanks-love-jimmy/comment-page-1/#comment-72766</link>
		<dc:creator>fanta zero ingredients - Dogpile Web Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 16:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ldopa.net/2006/10/11/dear-chemistry-guys-thanks-love-jimmy/#comment-72766</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] that can form the cancer ...       consumerist.com/tag/fanta/   &#149; Found on Yahoo! Search     ldopa.net &#187; archive &#187; dear chemistry guys: thanks. love, jimmy   Well, a quick glance at the ingredients indicated the presence of an extra ... those that IÂ’ve [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] that can form the cancer &#8230;       consumerist.com/tag/fanta/   &#8226; Found on Yahoo! Search     ldopa.net &#187; archive &#187; dear chemistry guys: thanks. love, jimmy   Well, a quick glance at the ingredients indicated the presence of an extra &#8230; those that IÂ’ve [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muhammad Azam Khan</title>
		<link>http://ldopa.net/2006/10/11/dear-chemistry-guys-thanks-love-jimmy/comment-page-1/#comment-14430</link>
		<dc:creator>Muhammad Azam Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 16:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ldopa.net/2006/10/11/dear-chemistry-guys-thanks-love-jimmy/#comment-14430</guid>
		<description>please can you tell me that why some gases are heavier then air and some are lighter than air?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please can you tell me that why some gases are heavier then air and some are lighter than air?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie</title>
		<link>http://ldopa.net/2006/10/11/dear-chemistry-guys-thanks-love-jimmy/comment-page-1/#comment-12826</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ldopa.net/2006/10/11/dear-chemistry-guys-thanks-love-jimmy/#comment-12826</guid>
		<description>True fact: I lie awake in bed worring about soda-induced bone resorption. Luckily Coke has funded numerous studies denying this phenomenon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True fact: I lie awake in bed worring about soda-induced bone resorption. Luckily Coke has funded numerous studies denying this phenomenon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://ldopa.net/2006/10/11/dear-chemistry-guys-thanks-love-jimmy/comment-page-1/#comment-12785</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 23:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ldopa.net/2006/10/11/dear-chemistry-guys-thanks-love-jimmy/#comment-12785</guid>
		<description>second only to &quot;crystal pepsi&quot;.  
jesus, what a goat fuck of an idea that was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>second only to &#8220;crystal pepsi&#8221;.<br />
jesus, what a goat fuck of an idea that was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://ldopa.net/2006/10/11/dear-chemistry-guys-thanks-love-jimmy/comment-page-1/#comment-12781</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 23:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ldopa.net/2006/10/11/dear-chemistry-guys-thanks-love-jimmy/#comment-12781</guid>
		<description>i think the moniker &quot;diet sprite zero&quot; was used during the transition from &quot;diet sprite&quot; to &quot;sprite zero&quot;.  i think all the 0 cal products of the coca cola company have aligned under the name &quot;zero&quot;.  except of course for their already established and best selling &quot;diet&quot; brand names, which i&#039;m sure they&#039;ll never change after the lesson they learned from the great &quot;New Coke/Coke II/Coke Classic&quot; disaster of the mid 80&#039;s.

and yes, i agree it is a bit strange that these products contain nothing but water and just enough preservatives and flavor/color ingredients to fool your tongue and keep it fresh on the shelf for years and years.  and though there are risks associated with too much sugar, i&#039;m sure there will be a few uncovered in the coming years as a result of ingesting these other ingredients (as there have already been with aspartame and sacchrine).  but with the 12 to 24oz at most per day that i drink of the stuff, i&#039;ll gladly accept those risks over the 400 or so completely empty calories that i would be ingesting otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think the moniker &#8220;diet sprite zero&#8221; was used during the transition from &#8220;diet sprite&#8221; to &#8220;sprite zero&#8221;.  i think all the 0 cal products of the coca cola company have aligned under the name &#8220;zero&#8221;.  except of course for their already established and best selling &#8220;diet&#8221; brand names, which i&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll never change after the lesson they learned from the great &#8220;New Coke/Coke II/Coke Classic&#8221; disaster of the mid 80&#8242;s.</p>
<p>and yes, i agree it is a bit strange that these products contain nothing but water and just enough preservatives and flavor/color ingredients to fool your tongue and keep it fresh on the shelf for years and years.  and though there are risks associated with too much sugar, i&#8217;m sure there will be a few uncovered in the coming years as a result of ingesting these other ingredients (as there have already been with aspartame and sacchrine).  but with the 12 to 24oz at most per day that i drink of the stuff, i&#8217;ll gladly accept those risks over the 400 or so completely empty calories that i would be ingesting otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The CyberSlug</title>
		<link>http://ldopa.net/2006/10/11/dear-chemistry-guys-thanks-love-jimmy/comment-page-1/#comment-12776</link>
		<dc:creator>The CyberSlug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 20:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ldopa.net/2006/10/11/dear-chemistry-guys-thanks-love-jimmy/#comment-12776</guid>
		<description>Also disturbing:  I saw &quot;Diet Sprite Zero&quot; in a vending machine today.

If it&#039;s already got 0 calories and 0 caffiene, what else are they taking out at this point?

Or is there no regular &quot;Sprite Zero&quot;? - I tried to look at Coca-Cola&#039;s website and see, but it is just too God-awful to even attempt to navigate.  If not, why tag one &quot;Zero&quot; product with &quot;diet&quot; but not the others?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also disturbing:  I saw &#8220;Diet Sprite Zero&#8221; in a vending machine today.</p>
<p>If it&#8217;s already got 0 calories and 0 caffiene, what else are they taking out at this point?</p>
<p>Or is there no regular &#8220;Sprite Zero&#8221;? &#8211; I tried to look at Coca-Cola&#8217;s website and see, but it is just too God-awful to even attempt to navigate.  If not, why tag one &#8220;Zero&#8221; product with &#8220;diet&#8221; but not the others?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: ldopa.net @ 2012-02-09 09:22:33 -->
