Comments on: settle a bet http://ldopa.net/2005/07/28/settle-a-bet/ in perpetual beta Tue, 24 Jan 2012 23:23:36 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Evan http://ldopa.net/2005/07/28/settle-a-bet/comment-page-1/#comment-67 Evan Wed, 10 Aug 2005 07:28:37 +0000 http://ldopa.net/2005/07/28/settle-a-bet/#comment-67 Hah! I mean.. hah. Hah! I mean.. hah.

]]> By: Sarah http://ldopa.net/2005/07/28/settle-a-bet/comment-page-1/#comment-43 Sarah Wed, 03 Aug 2005 23:28:32 +0000 http://ldopa.net/2005/07/28/settle-a-bet/#comment-43 well, that shows how much *you* know. ;P well, that shows how much *you* know. ;P

]]> By: Jeff http://ldopa.net/2005/07/28/settle-a-bet/comment-page-1/#comment-42 Jeff Wed, 03 Aug 2005 22:37:29 +0000 http://ldopa.net/2005/07/28/settle-a-bet/#comment-42 Yeah, I lobbied against it at the time; it just seems to me if you have a choice between "being in pornography" and "not being in pornography", you should choose the latter. Yeah, I lobbied against it at the time; it just seems to me if you have a choice between “being in pornography” and “not being in pornography”, you should choose the latter.

]]> By: Evan http://ldopa.net/2005/07/28/settle-a-bet/comment-page-1/#comment-41 Evan Wed, 03 Aug 2005 20:43:24 +0000 http://ldopa.net/2005/07/28/settle-a-bet/#comment-41 Did you know she was going to be on one of those websites a few years ago? Did you know she was going to be on one of those websites a few years ago?

]]> By: Jeff http://ldopa.net/2005/07/28/settle-a-bet/comment-page-1/#comment-39 Jeff Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:58:10 +0000 http://ldopa.net/2005/07/28/settle-a-bet/#comment-39 with good reason! with good reason!

]]> By: Sarah http://ldopa.net/2005/07/28/settle-a-bet/comment-page-1/#comment-38 Sarah Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:58:22 +0000 http://ldopa.net/2005/07/28/settle-a-bet/#comment-38 you're both fired. you’re both fired.

]]> By: Joshua http://ldopa.net/2005/07/28/settle-a-bet/comment-page-1/#comment-37 Joshua Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:44:02 +0000 http://ldopa.net/2005/07/28/settle-a-bet/#comment-37 For what it's worth, the reason I thought Sarah was a Suicide Girl is because I thought Jeff told me so. In fact, I'd assumed that's where he'd gotten all his Sarah-themed pornography, though now I realize that it may have, in fact, been shanghaied hoboes wearing Sarah masks. Also, how about a photo theme that explores the permutations of Fitt's Law? You could start off standing in a room, then, as you walk toward one wall, your clothes disappear. When you reach the wall, you knock into it.... <i>knocking off more clothes!</i> You keep bumping into the wall, no longer moving forward, but your clothes <i>keep coming off!</i> (N.B.: to properly represent Fitt's Law, you will have to wear an infinite amount of clothing, which is not only impractical, but also unsexy. The solultion to this problem is left as an excercise to the reader.) For what it’s worth, the reason I thought Sarah was a Suicide Girl is because I thought Jeff told me so. In fact, I’d assumed that’s where he’d gotten all his Sarah-themed pornography, though now I realize that it may have, in fact, been shanghaied hoboes wearing Sarah masks.

Also, how about a photo theme that explores the permutations of Fitt’s Law? You could start off standing in a room, then, as you walk toward one wall, your clothes disappear. When you reach the wall, you knock into it…. knocking off more clothes!

You keep bumping into the wall, no longer moving forward, but your clothes keep coming off!

(N.B.: to properly represent Fitt’s Law, you will have to wear an infinite amount of clothing, which is not only impractical, but also unsexy. The solultion to this problem is left as an excercise to the reader.)

]]>