Comments on: corrections, retractions, and apologies

By: Jeff

Jeff — Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:51:30 +0000

Tucker, I don’t know how to tell you this, but we’re all looking forward to your eventual demise. Josh and I just went black suit shopping just last week, and we all call each other late at night to practice our eulogies.

For my eulogy, I’m going to gargle “Old Susanna” while holding American flags and balancing on a unicycle, and at the very end, the oversize black-and-white headshot of you is going to pop open and bottle rockets are going to shoot out into your open grave for a full five minutes.

By: Tucker

Tucker — Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:41:50 +0000

No no, conversation is perfectly acceptable, just that you haven’t done it in a while. Nor have I, so there is that, but I was under the impression that you were looking forward to my eventual demise.

Nice to hear from you.

By: Joshua

Joshua — Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:04:16 +0000

Yes, all of them.

By: Joshua

Joshua — Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:58:25 +0000

It’s because they’re in the laundry.

By: Joshua

Joshua — Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:58:00 +0000

I love that street.

Also, I have a very good reason to not wear pants.

By: Sarah

Sarah — Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:36:19 +0000

No, but this does. ;)

Am I not supposed to talk to you, Tucker? I didn’t get that memo. . .

Joshua, the court is still out on what kind of “cred” you get for that reference. Perhaps you’re looking for “street cred”, in which case, might I recommend Creepy-Guy-With-T-shirt-&-Neckerchief-But-No-Pants Street. :)

By: Tucker

Tucker — Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:53:44 +0000

Correction noted. Does this count as Sarah talking to me?

By: Joshua

Joshua — Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:39:38 +0000

I can’t believe she’s not reading my posts.

I referred to Mumenschantz! Doesn’t that get me cred?